Advantages and Disadvantages of Net Zero Energy Building
With the UK becoming the first major economy to pass the net-zero emissions law, people’s centre of attraction will be Net Zero Energy Buildings. The government has already rolled out the laws and strategies to clash emissions by 78% in 2035. Many nations are set to follow in the footsteps of the UK. But how effective the concept would be in practicality? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Net Zero Energy Building explore the pros and cons.
What is a Net-Zero Building?
A net-zero energy building is a type of building that generates as much or more energy than it uses. A net-zero energy building produces as much or more energy than it consumes. This means that you can use the building's electricity for free and save money on your electric bills.
With the global pollution level taking its toll, it is no surprise that planet's resources are quickly depleting while the earth suffers from climate change. Net-zero energy buildings provide a cleaner environment for you to live in; they use significantly less electricity than traditional homes do and help reduce carbon footprint.
What are the Advantages of Net Zero Energy Building?
Net zero energy buildings offer an attractive investment for any business looking to take advantage of tax credits and incentives. But what about the benefits? The answer is simple - these future buildings require less time, money, and resources to operate than traditional buildings. Some of the main advantages of Net Zero Energy building are as follows.
1. Very Economical
Considered the next level of smart homes, Net zero energy buildings provide several advantages for their owners. These buildings produce clean energy and can be cheaper in the long run than traditional buildings. In addition, they usually need less maintenance and don't use up as much electricity. Overall, it is a wise choice to convert your home or business into one of these structures for your own good.
2. Reliability is one the Key advantages of Net Zero Energy building
The reliability of a net-zero energy building is better than your average building. You will not have to worry about blackouts, power surges, and brownouts because the buildings are equipped with generators that run on fuel cells. Generators can be switched on if there is an emergency, and they will automatically switch back off when the power returns.
3. Environmental Friendly
The net-zero energy building is environmentally sound and sustainable. Such buildings reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the net-zero energy building relies on technologies that enable it to be more efficient with its resources than a typical building. This means that the net-zero energy building has a smaller ecological footprint than any other style of construction.
4. Lower emission of carbon
As environmentally friendly as net zero energy buildings are, they are even better for the environment. They do not emit as much carbon into the atmosphere, making your home or business a cleaner place to live in. In addition, these buildings use significantly less electricity than traditional ones, saving you money on your electric bill. All of these benefits will provide a boost to your bank account and a clean environment to live in.
5. Higher resale value
The buildings constructed based on energy-efficient technology will require less maintenance. Therefore, Net-zero energy buildings are seen as more desirable and valuable, which means that the price of your property will rise significantly due to the reduction in maintenance. An added advantage of net-zero energy buildings is that they also have a higher resale value.
What are the Disadvantages of Net Zero Energy Building?
Net Zero Energy Buildings are a great way to reduce your carbon footprint, but they may not be the answer for everyone. Net-zero energy buildings have some potential disadvantages that need to be considered before deciding if it’s right for you.
1. Building Costs
One of the disadvantages of net zero energy building is that it may be expensive. Initially, you need to pay for a good deal of equipment to save money in the long run. There are also other costs that you need to incur since you will need to keep replacing parts for your system from time to time.
2. The Grid
You need to be connected to the grid or have an onsite power plant for your building's energy needs to be met with renewable energy sources. If you depend heavily on oil and gas, this might not work well for you. Also, most net zero energy buildings use less electricity which means that they will also emit fewer greenhouse gases into the atmosphere but won't eliminate them because fossil fuels still generate some emissions.
3. Renewable Resources Availability & Reliability
One of the disadvantages of net-zero energy buildings is a lack of renewable resources in the area. This can be an issue for buildings if you are not able to produce your own renewable energy. Another disadvantage of net zero energy buildings is that they are costlier to build than other types of buildings, which can cause companies to pass on the higher costs to their customers.
4. Trained Workforce Main Disadvantages of Net Zero Energy Building
The net zero energy building workforce needs to be trained in the latest technology, and investment money will need to go into training programs that go by the wayside as budgets shrink for many companies.
5. Longevity of Renewable Energy Sources
Some sources such as wind power only generate electricity when it is windy, so you may not have enough renewable energy available during periods of calm weather or when demand peaks because there's a lack of natural resources like sun, water or wind that can generate electricity at those times.
Conclusion on Pros and Cons of Net Zero Energy Building
As nations have enshrined stricter laws with regards to climate change, Net Zero Energy buildings will become the new norm. But there is a lot of confusion about precisely what net-zero energy means. As of now, very few people are aware of the Pros and cons of Net Zero Energy building and how it affects the environment. As the world approaches 2035, Zero Net would have turned into a catchphrase for the developed world. But, developing nations have yet to cover the distance in terms of eco-friendly and emission control.